• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Humorouz

Mega Size Mega Fun

Archives for January 2022

Rubio: ‘It Isn’t Even Left or Right Anymore. It’s Crazy Versus Normal’

January 9, 2022 by humorouz Leave a Comment

Vice President Kamala Harris and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) applaud President Joe Biden as he addresses a joint session of Congress on April 28, 2021. (Photo by CHIP SOMODEVILLA/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)

(CNSNews.com) – There’s a new “dividing line” in American politics, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) told Fox News Wednesday night.

He noted that Election Day is the one day of the year when “normal” people have their say, while “crazy” media elites, pundits and politicians must shut up for a change and listen.

“It isn’t even left or right anymore. It’s crazy versus normal,” Rubio said:

It’s these people that run our school systems and so forth, and parents who, during the pandemic for the first time, got to see what their kids were learning because they were learning from home. And they’re, like, you’re learning what?! They’re you teaching what?! And when they spoke up, now they’re domestic terrorists.

And look, I watched with great interest about all this (media) coverage about white supremacists. In Virginia last night, as you pointed out, a Jamaican immigrant, African-American woman, was elected lieutenant governor of the state.  A Cuban-American was elected attorney general of the Commonwealth of Virginia. None of that’s being reported.

These people (leftists) are nuts. They spend all day on television and after they’re off the air talking to everybody, and they all agree with each other because they all live in one or two cities. And they literally are completely out of touch with the fact that 97 percent of the American population lives completely different lives, has completely different views, and then when election day comes, they can’t explain it, so they chalk it up to, they cheated or white supremacists or whatever. They make something up, because they can’t comprehend it.

Last night was the beginning of that pushback, and I think it’s going to continue. And you asked about the agenda here, it’s the craziest thing I’ve ever seen. These people are governing like they have a mandate to radically remake the country. It’s build back socialism.

It doesn’t matter if it’s $1.75 trillion or $3.5 trillion, they want to take control of pre-k, of child care, the only two elements of education they don’t control now. They want to take control of that. They want to hire 80,000 IRS agents, so the pushback is only going to grow.

And this administration, by the way, has been disastrous on everything, whether it’s Afghanistan, now it’s Russia threatening to invade Ukraine, Taiwan, supply chains. They can’t name you a single thing that Joe Biden has managed correctly in his first nine or ten months as president. They can’t name you one.

Rubio criticized Democrats for reversing the things Trump accomplished, “even the things that made sense,” such as the border wall.

And he noted that President Biden is shutting down oil and gas production domestically, while asking other countries to produce more: “This is crazy. If I had described this to anybody two years ago, they would say that is never going to happen. The other guys aren’t that crazy. Yes, they are,” Rubio said.

Filed Under: Articles - World

Remembering the life and laugh of Demaryius Thomas

January 9, 2022 by humorouz Leave a Comment

In overtime against the Steelers in the 2011 playoffs, it took just eight seconds from the time he cradled a Tim Tebow pass in his arms for him to cross the goal line and deliver one of the Broncos’ most memorable wins. During Peyton Manning’s seven-touchdown performance against the Ravens in 2013, Thomas caught a screen pass and raced away from defenders for a 78-yard score. The five-time Pro Bowler and Super Bowl champion possessed more than straight-line speed. His hands flashed quickly to haul in Manning’s record-breaking 509th touchdown, and he would often stamp his toes down to secure another acrobatic catch.

Thomas posted incredible on-field accomplishments. He was the first receiver drafted in 2010, his prolific numbers place him high in the Broncos’ record books and he’s a surefire future Ring of Famer. We’ve remembered his accomplishments, and we’ll continue to keep his legacy alive in the days, weeks, months and years to come.

You have to understand: When I arrived in Denver as a digital media intern in May of 2016, D.T. was a big deal. He was coming off four consecutive Pro Bowl appearances with at least 1,300 receiving yards — and he seemed larger than life. 

I’d joined the Broncos right out of college, and save for a three-month stint with the Miami Herald covering the Dolphins, Florida Panthers and Miami Heat, I’d only really interacted with college athletes. I’d never worked for a team before, and I wasn’t really sure what sort of interaction I’d have with professional athletes. 

Early in my time in Denver — it was likely during the team’s offseason program — I wandered down to the cafeteria to get a coffee. As I put the cup under the machine, I felt a tap on my right shoulder. I turned to look, and there was no one there. I figured it was a coworker, but when I glanced back to my left, there was D.T., staring at the ceiling, acting like he had nothing to do with it. 

It would’ve been hard to blame him if he lived his life with resentment. He had a childhood that most could not — and do not — make it through; His mother and grandmother were arrested for non-violent drug offenses when he was 11, and they spent half his life in prison before they had their sentences commuted in 2015 and 2016, respectively.

During my first several seasons with the team, I was also responsible for taking photos on Saturday mornings before home games and as the team departed for road games. I am not a good photographer — my editor jokes that my style is “dark and blurry” — so I was often dependent on the subject to make the pictures worth using. On their way out to a Saturday walkthrough or to the bus on their way to Kansas City, San Diego or Oakland, it wasn’t unusual for players to trudge by without looking at the camera. Others would stop and want a posed photo.

Thomas had a gentler side to him, too. On those same Saturday mornings, Broncos players and coaches would bring their children to UCHealth Training Center to eat breakfast with them. D.T. also treated everyone else’s sons and daughters like they were his own. Every Saturday morning that I was in that cafeteria, Thomas would walk into the building and former Running Backs Coach and Assistant Head Coach Eric Studesville’s son, E.J., would run to Thomas.

Thomas’ community work in Denver largely revolved around helping children, as he always had time to support kids from the Broncos Boys & Girls Club, the Make-A-Wish foundation and so many other kids in need. You’ll never see a better Santa Claus than D.T. at the Boys & Girls Club holiday party.

On a day-to-day basis, D.T. was always there with a fist bump and to ask how you were doing. You could tell he always meant it, too. 

Just this summer, I saw Thomas at Manning’s Hall of Fame induction. We hadn’t really spoken since he left Denver, and there’s hundreds of staffers that likely crossed his path during his career. When D.T. saw me, he lit up and pulled me in for a hug. He had a knack for making everyone feel like they were the most important person in the room.

Filed Under: Articles - World

Hilarious clip of Betty White brutally roasting Sandra Bullock goes viral

January 9, 2022 by humorouz Leave a Comment

A hilarious clip of Betty White and Sandra Bullock is being shared on social media as fans continue to share their favorite on-screen moments following White’s death at age 99 on Dec. 31, 2021.

White received the Screen Actors Guild’s Life Achievement Award back in 2010. Bullock — who co-starred with White in the 2009 film “The Proposal” — presented the award to White who then proceeded to brutally roast the fellow actor.

“Oh my dears, I can’t…,” White says as she begins her acceptance speech.

She then reaches for Bullock’s hand seemingly to show her appreciation for the touching tribute she delivered.

“And the fact that this lovely lady, she is such a wonderful one and with all the wonderful things that have happened to her …” White gushed, adding, “Isn’t it heartening to see how far a girl as plain as she is can go?”

Mic drop.

Bullock immediately bursts into laughter as well as the star-studded audience. Drew Barrymore and “Modern Family” stars Ty Burrell and Eric Stonestreet can be seen applauding in amusement to White’s wise crack.

“This is my absolute favorite Betty White moment,” wrote Buzzfeed deputy editorial director Spencer Althouse who first shared the clip on Twitter. “Her Lifetime SAG Award acceptance speech where she roasted Sandra Bullock to hell and back. RIP to a legend.”

Journalist Matthew Berry reshared the clip with the caption, “Betty White’s timing — on even the simplest joke — was always elite.”

As the video began to circulate on social media, White’s fans continued to share their thoughts on the television icon’s death.

“Every time I see another funny clip of her, I start crying all over again…,” one Twitter user said.

“Timing. Wit. Charm. That was our #BettyWhite. We’ll miss you,” added another.

White was preparing to celebrate her 100th birthday on January 17.

Ahead of the celebration, she opened up to People in a cover story about how she felt about turning 100 years old. “I’m so lucky to be in such good health and feel so good at this age,” she said. “It’s amazing.”

White shared the key to her upbeat nature was being “born a cockeyed optimist.”

“I got it from my mom, and that never changed,” she told the outlet. “I always find the positive.”

Filed Under: Articles - World

The Great Dictator: The film that dared to laugh at Hitler

January 8, 2022 by humorouz Leave a Comment

Eighty years ago, Charlie Chaplin skewered the Nazis in his satire The Great Dictator. Nicholas Barber looks at how the film has wider relevance today.

More like this:
– How Britain fought the Nazis with humour
– The painting that fought Fascism
– The long-lost Hitler sitcom

“I began receiving alarming messages from United Artists,” he wrote in his autobiography. “They had been advised… that I would run into censorship trouble. Also the English office was very concerned about an anti-Hitler picture and doubted whether it could be shown in Britain. More worrying letters came from the New York office imploring me not to make the film, declaring it would never be shown in England or America.”

Chaplin didn’t just capture Hitler, but every dictator who has followed in his goose steps

But Chaplin wouldn’t be dissuaded. He knew that The Great Dictator was worth making, and, sure enough, it was a box office smash: 1941’s second biggest hit in the US. On the 80th anniversary of the film’s release, Chaplin’s prescience is even more startling. The Great Dictator is a masterpiece that isn’t just a delightful comedy and a grim agitprop drama, but a spookily accurate insight into Hitler’s psychology. “He was a visionary,” said Costa-Gavras, the Greek-French doyen of political cinema, in a making-of documentary. “He saw the future while the leaders of the world couldn’t see it, and remained on Hitler’s side.”

Released in 1940, The Great Dictator has been praised for its prescience (Credit: Getty Images)

What’s even more remarkable is that Chaplin didn’t just capture Hitler, but every dictator who has followed in his goose steps. “It resonated at the time, and it continues to resonate,” says Simon Louvish, the author of Chaplin: The Tramp’s Odyssey. If you want to see a crystalline reflection of the 21st Century’s despots, you’ll find it in a film that came out 80 years ago.

A serious message

By the time Chaplin made The Great Dictator, he had long despised the Nazis, and vice versa. A German propaganda film denounced him as one of “the foreign Jews who come to Germany” – never mind that he wasn’t Jewish – while the US press nicknamed him “The 20th-Century Moses” because he funded the escape of thousands of Jewish refugees. When he started work on the film initially titled “The Dictator”, he was “a man on a mission”, says Louvish. “Some of his contemporaries, like Laurel and Hardy, just wanted to make funny movies and make money. But Chaplin was very serious about what he wanted to say. The Great Dictator wasn’t just a film. It really was something that was required.”

Still, Chaplin was motivated by more than humanitarianism. He was also fascinated by his uncanny connections to Hitler, who was born in the same week as he was in April 1889. A comic song about the Führer, recorded by Tommy Handley in 1939, was entitled “Who Is That Man…? (Who Looks Like Charlie Chaplin)”. An editorial in The Spectator magazine, marking the men’s 50th birthdays, explored the theme in more depth: “Providence was in an ironical mood when… it was ordained that Charles Chaplin and Adolf Hitler should make their entry into the world within four days of each other… The date of their birth and the identical little moustache (grotesque intentionally in Mr Chaplin) they wear might have been fixed by nature to betray the common origin of their genius. For genius each of them undeniably possesses. Each has mirrored the same reality – the predicament of the ‘little man’ in modern society. Each is a distorting mirror, the one for good, the other for untold evil.”

Chaplin drew on his physical similarity to Hitler when playing the Tomainian despot (Credit: Getty Images)

It was Alexander Korda, the Hungarian-born British producer, who suggested that Chaplin should capitalise on the similarity, but it was obvious that an entire film of the former “Little Tramp” as a frothing tyrant would be too much for audiences to take, and so Chaplin opted to play two roles. He would be Adenoid Hynkel, the autocratic ruler of Tomainia, and he would be a humble, amnesiac, unnamed “Jewish Barber”. An opening caption announces: “Any Resemblance Between Hynkel the Dictator and the Jewish Barber is Purely Co-Incidental.”

Inevitably, this coincidental resemblance results in the two men being mistaken for one another, but not until the film’s climax. The Barber is hustled onto a stage where his doppelganger was due to make a speech, and Chaplin delivers a sincere five-minute plea for decency and brotherhood that either spoils the film (in the view of the Pulitzer-winning critic Roger Ebert) or elevates it further still: “More than machinery, we need humanity! More than cleverness, we need kindness and gentleness!” For most of the running time, though, Chaplin cuts between the two characters’ separate storylines, so that we can never forget either the victims of Nazi persecution or the man responsible for it. In the ghetto, the gentle Barber romances a defiant washerwoman, Hannah, who is played by Chaplin’s wife at the time, Paulette Godard. (The scene in which Storm Troopers pelt Hannah with the tomatoes they have just stolen from a grocer’s shop is the most infuriating portrait of cowardly bullying imaginable.) Meanwhile, in his palace, Hynkel – aka the Phooey rather than the Führer – frets about how to outmanoeuvre his Mussolini-like rival, Benzino Napaloni.

The speed with which Chaplin flips between slapstick and horror is breathtaking

Both strands are so bold that they make most big-screen satire seem feeble in comparison. In Ernst Lubitsch’s To Be or Not to Be, which came out in 1942, the word “Jew” is never spoken. Chaplin isn’t so coy. Central to the ghetto scenes is the fact that “Jew” has been daubed on all of the windows in capital letters. When the Barber tries to wipe off the paint, he is chased by Storm Troopers in sequences that recall Buster Keaton dodging crowds of policemen in Cops. But in this case, one such sequence concludes with the Storm Troopers throwing a noose around the Barber’s neck and hanging him from a lamp post. He is saved at the last second, but still, the speed with which Chaplin flips between slapstick and horror is breathtaking. It’s also worth noting that the Storm Troopers don’t have German accents – or even upper-crust English accents, as so many Nazis would in later Hollywood films. Most of them sound American.

Jack Oakie played Napaloni, an Italian autocrat who competes with Hynkel in increasingly childish ways (Credit: Getty Images)

In Hynkel’s palace, the comedy is lighter and more farcical. Chaplin sketches a caricature of European political shenanigans in the zany tradition of the Marx Brothers’ Duck Soup. (Jack Oakie’s Napaloni is the kind of hearty Italian wise guy played by Chico Marx.) The dictator’s crimes aren’t ignored: on a whim, Hynkel orders 3000 protesters to be executed. But Chaplin concentrates on the character’s vanity, stupidity and childishness. In one throwaway visual gag, the towering filing cabinet behind his desk is shown to have no drawers at all, but several concealed mirrors instead. When Napaloni pays a state visit from the neighbouring country of Bacteria, the two men compete to have the higher chair while they are being shaved, and to have the more flattering position when they are being photographed.

The message is that Hynkel is not a brilliant strategist or a mighty leader. He is an overgrown adolescent – as demonstrated in the sublime set piece in which he dances with an inflatable globe, dreaming of being “emperor of the world”. He is an insecure buffoon who bluffs, cheats, obsesses over his public image, manhandles his secretaries, revels in the luxury of his extravagant quarters, and reverses his own key policies in order to buy himself more time in power. “To me, the funniest thing in the world is to ridicule impostors,” wrote Chaplin in his autobiography, “and it would be hard to find a bigger impostor than Hitler.”

Chaplin portrayed Hynkel as an insecure buffoon, emphasising how ridiculous his bluster is (Credit: Getty Images)

Hynkel’s anti-Semitic rants (consisting of cod-German punctuated by shouts of “Juden”) are terrifying, but there is no conviction behind them, just a desperate need to distract the Tomainians from his economic failures. As his urbane sidekick and Goebbels substitute, Garbitsch (Henry Daniell), says: “Violence against the Jews might take the public’s mind off its stomach.”

The film has been accused of trivialising Nazi atrocities. Chaplin himself said, in his autobiography, “Had I known the actual horrors of the German concentration camps, I could not have made The Great Dictator; I could not have made fun of the homicidal insanity of the Nazis.” But he isn’t just making fun of Hitler – as Mel Brooks did in The Producers in 1967 – he is making an astute point about the fragile egos of male world leaders.

Think of today’s dictators and would-be dictators, in any country, and you can spot all the juvenile qualities that Chaplin identified: the fetish for photo opportunities, the lavish lifestyles, the policy flip-flops and the crackpot schemes, the self-aggrandising parades and the chests full of medals: Billy Gilbert’s Herring, ie. Göring, has so many medals pinned to his uniform that Hynkel has to turn him sideways to find room for the latest addition. Hitler was at the peak of his power when The Great Dictator was being made, but Chaplin had already recognised that, as with every subsequent dictator, his villainy was bound up with his immaturity.

According to biographer Jürgen Trimborn, much of the film was inspired by a screening of Leni Riefenstahl’s pro-Hitler documentary, Triumph of the Will, at the New York Museum of Modern Art. While other viewers were appalled, Chaplin roared with laughter at the ridiculous spectacle. This attitude sustained him when he was urged to abandon The Great Dictator. “I was determined to go ahead,” he wrote in his autobiography, “for Hitler must be laughed at.”

Love film and TV? Join BBC Culture Film and TV Club on Facebook, a community for cinephiles all over the world.

If you would like to comment on this story or anything else you have seen on BBC Culture, head over to our Facebook page or message us on Twitter.

And if you liked this story, sign up for the weekly bbc.com features newsletter, called The Essential List. A handpicked selection of stories from BBC Future, Culture, Worklife and Travel, delivered to your inbox every Friday.

Filed Under: Articles - World

This GameStop thing isn’t funny, it’s stupid

January 8, 2022 by humorouz Leave a Comment

Summary List Placement

There is this bizarre narrative that the Reddit-driven GameStop stock bubble amounts to a way for ordinary investors to “stick it to the man” by causing some hedge funds to lose money. That those funds have been taught a lesson for selling short. Like GameStop’s current share price, this narrative doesn’t make any sense.

As of this writing, GameStop’s share price of around $340 gives it a market capitalization of roughly $23 billion. For comparison, Best Buy is worth $29.5 billion. But Best Buy is a far larger enterprise — it has about three times as many employees as GameStop — and more importantly, Best Buy makes money. It earned profits of $1.5 billion in 2019, while GameStop lost $471 million.

The original, putative theory behind the Reddit-driven push to buy GameStop was that the company had a good turnaround plan and would successfully shift to online game sales and start making money again. Whatever the merits of that theory when the markets valued GameStop at less than $1 billion, it’s out the window at a market cap of $23 billion. Even with a turnaround and rosy expectations of future profits from the GameStop business, the valuation of the company at this point is not justified by actual business fundamentals.

Retail investors getting caught up in a ridiculous bubble is not a win for the little guy

Given the divorce of the price from the actual underlying business, GameStop’s stock has been turned into a purely speculative asset, like a cryptocurrency. 

Yes, some hedge funds lost money, and a lot of retail investors are up, for now. But they can’t access those gains until they sell. When they sell, the price of GameStop will fall, and the retail investors who bought late will lose money, because there’s no fundamental reason for other people to buy at such a high price.

And why should we assume the net losses on this price roller coaster will accrue to institutional investors? Some shorts got popped with the run-up in GameStop, but a fading, money-losing business with a sudden market cap over $20 billion for no good reason is surely attractive to new short-sellers, who will gain as the new retail buyers lose.

If GameStop is overvalued by $20 billion right now, that’s $20 billion of losses waiting to accrue, largely to ordinary investors who got caught up in a fad. And while some of the more online traders have gotten cheered for buying at the top by their internet friends, this is far from a desirable democratization of Wall Street — this is just a new way for regular people to lose their shirts.

I am not a salty loser

Before you call me a “crybaby loser” whose short position blew up — as a number of you have been doing on Twitter for the last couple of days — I want to be clear: I don’t do any short investing, which is prohibited anyway by Business Insider policies. This rule is so that I can call you an idiot from a position of objectivity. I have never had any financial interest in GameStop, except for the very small long position I hold due to my ownership of total market index funds. My shirt is not the one getting lost here.

And who decided short selling was a bad thing? Shorts play a valuable role: they help identify companies that aren’t worth what they appear to be, so those companies don’t waste more of investors’ money.

Actually, short selling is good

I realize shorts seem like huge spoilsports and killjoys for betting against the futures of specific businesses. But the purpose of the stock market is to allocate capital to productive businesses, so that useful investments are made in the real economy. It doesn’t always work perfectly, but fomenting irrational froth in businesses with no fundamental reason to soar in value only makes the markets less effective at that goal, while short campaigns against overvalued companies make it more effective.

“Short sellers have alerted us to problems in companies before the government and others did, like at Enron,” notes Jason Furman, professor of practice of economic policy at Harvard and former chairman of Barack Obama’s Council of Economic Advisers.

Shorts more recently helped reveal the financial fraud at Wirecard — over the objection of German regulators, who defended the payments company when short-sellers accused it of accounting shenanigans.

If you want to see what a market without short selling looks like, look at the private markets, which have in recent years blown bubbles public investors wouldn’t tolerate, like at WeWork and Theranos. If it had been possible to sell Theranos stock short, maybe it wouldn’t have taken a decade to figure out the company didn’t actually have a product.

Not everything should be democratized

I understand people feel frustrated by low interest rates, which mean you can’t park money in a risk-free asset and earn a significant return. This encourages investors to seek risk.

But the idea that retail investors have been deprived of the opportunity to make real money through vanilla investments isn’t true. If you bought broad stock funds three months ago, or a year ago, or five years ago, you’ve done quite nicely. And since the GameStop speculators by definition are people who had some money to put in the stock market, that avenue was available to them. So the idea that these people — bored people with money — are a downtrodden class engaged in a righteous fight against Wall Street just doesn’t wash.

The best thing to do to improve returns to vanilla investments that are appropriate for retail investors is to improve the long-run growth of the economy. And I do have one note of sympathy for the investors who complain there’s no yield to be had without nonsense like this.

One reason to favor a significant fiscal stimulus (besides that it will provide relief to the sort of people who don’t have money sitting around to throw at Reddit investing trends) is that if it “overheats” the economy — that is, tighten the labor market and cause prices to rise — that might tend to push interest rates up. This is not a switch the Fed itself can just decide to throw; rates are low because growth expectations are low. But boosting demand and output can boost those growth expectations and make higher rates appropriate again.

And in addition to increasing the return on safe assets, a rise in interest rates would, hopefully, take the gas out of investing bubbles, like this especially ridiculous one.

Join the conversation about this story »

Filed Under: Articles - World

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 10
  • Go to page 11
  • Go to page 12
  • Go to page 13
  • Go to page 14
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 17
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • The Ris of The Murder Mystery Game: Why Everyone is Dying to Play
  • Why Commercial Property in Singapore is Gaining Momentum Among Investors
  • Why Shophouses in Singapore Are One of the Most Profitable Property Investments Today
  • Shophouse Singapore: Blend of Heritage, Charm, and Investment Potential
  • Top 7 Most Visited Places of Attraction in Singapore

Recent Comments

    Archives

    • April 2025
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018

    Categories

    • Articles – World
    • Uncategorized

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org

    Copyright © 2025 · Metro Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in